Chris Traver

When you walk through the hallways of a K-12 school, you’re witnessing more than just education in action. You’re seeing the future taking shape. Every decision facility management professionals make today, from the cleaning products they select to the energy systems they maintain, influences not only the immediate learning environment but also shapes students’ understanding of their role in creating a healthier world. For many K-12 facility managers, sustainability is an overwhelming mandate with unclear benefits and uncertain costs. The reality, however, tells a different story. Schools that embrace sustainable facility management practices are discovering that environmental stewardship and operational excellence go hand in hand, delivering measurable improvements in student health, academic performance, and budget efficiency. Costs of conventional practices K-12 students miss approximately 14 million school days per year because of asthma, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Many of these absences can be traced to poor indoor environmental quality, including exposure to harsh chemicals commonly found in traditional cleaning products and facility maintenance operations. The numbers become even more striking when we look at the broader picture using statistics reported by the Green Education Foundation. More than 20% of public schools report unsatisfactory indoor air quality. However, controlling exposure to indoor environmental factors could prevent more than 65% of asthma cases among elementary school-age children. Meanwhile, custodial staff face 40 to 60 chemical injuries per year for every 1,000 workers, costing schools approximately US$25 million annually in workers’ compensation and lost time. These statistics represent students missing learning opportunities, staff facing preventable health risks, and districts watching valuable resources drain away through inefficiency. Sustainability advantages The financial case for sustainability extends beyond lost labor hours. Research from the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) found that although green schools cost approximately $3 more per square foot to maintain, they generate $74 per square foot in benefits through energy savings, increased attendance, and improved teacher retention. That’s nearly a 25-to-one return on investment. Schools embracing sustainable practices report saving up to four times the cost of going green through reduced energy consumption, lower operational expenses, and decreased health-related costs, according to the Green Schools Alliance. The alliance reported that sustainable schools see a 74% improvement in their ability to attract and retain quality teachers. In an era of teacher shortages, creating healthy, forward-thinking learning environments gives schools a significant competitive advantage in recruiting and keeping educators who contribute to student success. Five steps to sustainability The path to sustainability doesn’t require massive capital investments or complete operational overhauls. By implementing five actionable strategies, K-12 facility managers can create healthier schools while improving their school’s bottom line. 1. Establish baseline standards. Before you can improve, you need to know where you stand. Standardization tools can help you determine your starting point and end goals. One such tool, the ISSA Clean Standard: K-12, provides a comprehensive framework to assess cleaning effectiveness in school facilities objectively. This standard emphasizes a “clean, measure, monitor” philosophy that combines both objective measurements, such as adenosine triphosphate (ATP) testing, and traditional inspection methods. By implementing this standard, facility managers gain clear benchmarks for cleanliness levels, establish monitoring procedures, and create data-driven processes for continuous improvement. The ISSA Clean Standard: K-12 helps facility managers demonstrate the value of cleaning as an investment in health, safety, and the learning environment rather than merely an operational expense. 2. Transition to green-certified cleaning products. Industry research has debunked the perception that green cleaning products are expensive or ineffective. Today’s green-certified products perform comparably to or better than traditional chemical cleaners, often at similar or lower costs. More importantly, they dramatically reduce health risks for students and staff while improving indoor air quality. Look for products certified by reputable third-party organizations, such as Green Seal, EcoLogo, or the Environmental Protection Agency’s Safer Choice program. These certifications ensure that products meet rigorous environmental standards. Schools transitioning to green products report reduced eye, nose, and throat irritation, fewer asthma-related incidents, and safer working conditions. Facilities found that concentrated green cleaning systems reduce package waste and shipping costs while simplifying training through streamlined product lines. 3. Implement high-efficiency equipment and technologies. Modern cleaning equipment offers significant improvements in both sustainability and effectiveness. Microfiber cleaning systems, for example, require less water and fewer chemicals than traditional cotton mops while delivering superior cleaning results. High-efficiency vacuum cleaners with HEPA filtration capture more particulates, improving indoor air quality without increasing energy consumption. Energy-efficient equipment also supports broader sustainability goals. If all U.S. schools adopted energy-efficient cleaning equipment, the industry could save approximately 23 million tons of carbon emissions annually, according to the Indiana nonprofit Improving Kids’ Environment. While the initial investment in upgraded equipment may seem substantial, the operational savings and extended equipment life typically deliver positive returns within 18 to 36 months. 4. Focus on high-touch surface management. One of the most cost-effective sustainability strategies involves optimizing cleaning protocols for high-touch surfaces, such as door handles, light switches, desks, and restroom fixtures. By concentrating resources on these critical areas and using ATP testing to verify cleaning effectiveness, facility managers can reduce chemical usage, improve health outcomes, and deploy staff more efficiently. This targeted approach aligns perfectly with sustainable facility management principles that seek to achieve better outcomes with fewer resources. Schools implementing focused high-touch surface protocols alongside green cleaning products have documented reduced infection transmission rates and improved attendance without increasing labor costs. 5. Create a culture of continuous improvement. Sustainability isn’t a destination; it’s an ongoing journey of learning and adaptation. Engage students, teachers, and staff in sustainability initiatives through education, visible progress tracking, and celebration of achievements. When students participate in recycling programs, understand the science behind green cleaning, or help monitor energy usage, they develop environmental literacy skills that extend far beyond the classroom. Investments for the future The transition to sustainable facility management represents more than operational improvement. It’s an investment in student health, academic success, and environmental stewardship that prepares young people to become informed, engaged citizens. For facility

Follow CMM

Chris Traver

Regional Vice President of Sales, Emerald Ecovations

Articles by Chris Traver

Building a Healthier Tomorrow

Health and Safety

View the Latest CMM Magazine Edition